Here is an excerpt from the introduction to my soon-to-be-published book, The Pianist's guide to Practical Scales and Arpeggios: As They Occur in Pieces you Want to Play:
One sunny afternoon, just as my
weekly piano class drew to a close and I was racing to my studio,
one of my colleagues from the local music community confronted me. We stood in
the lobby of the recital hall at the university where I had just begun my
tenure, I with one hand on the door. “Is it true?” she spouted, her face a
puzzle of surprise and indignation. “You don’t believe in scales?”
I did not think of myself as a
blasphemer. Not then and not now. I am a realist, an advocate of practical use
of time and energy and my advocacy is based on knowledge and experience. But
her indignation gave me pause and I knew immediately what had pressed her
buttons.
At the first lessons with my
students I quizzed them on scales and arpeggios. Did they know all the keys?
Could they play all of the major and melodic minor scales hands together
fluently at a moderate tempo for at least two octaves? (Notice I don’t include
the harmonic minor, as it is for all practical purposes what its name implies,
a function of harmony and not particularly useful as we careen horizontally up
and down the keyboard.) I carefully observed their use of the thumb, which in
many cases was not well understood, so that became a separate technical issue.
Then I blasphemed. If the scales and arpeggios were fluent, I would not require
daily drilling and I certainly did not want to hear them. The life of a college
piano student, complex and time-challenged as it is, should not be encumbered
with useless ritual. Yes, useless, time-wasting ritual.
But,
Really, Are Scales and Arpeggios Necessary?
Well, yes and no. We need to understand the topography of the
keyboard and elementary keyboard harmony in order to navigate the keyboard’s
shoals and depths. Since we propel our hands laterally up and down the keyboard
by means of certain navigational tools, of which the thumb is one, how when and
where to activate the thumb has always been and remains a primary issue. So a
clear feel for the relationships of white to black keys and the appropriate
digits for depressing them is essential. Learn the patterns.
But do we really need to drill these learned patterns on a
daily basis as, for example, in a technical exercise? Once learned and
worked-in to the point of being automatic, it is no longer necessary or even
desirable to repeat them in their root positions for the purpose of gaining
finger “strength” or “agility” or “independence.” Rarely
do scales and arpeggios occur in music the way we learn them in books, that is,
until now in this book.
When is a scale not a scale? Scales and Arpeggios serve
various purposes in the music we play. They can provide melodic interest,
connective tissue, embellishment or an element of brilliance for its own sake. Our
job as pianists is to notice this and organize our thinking accordingly. Here
is a perfectly innocent G major scale minding its own business:
![]() |
Innocent G major Scale |
Now
add some rhythm and the innocent G major scale becomes a melody on its way
somewhere:
![]() |
Melody in G major |
Add some harmony and perhaps a touch of
harp and we have a ballet by Tchaikovsky:
![]() |
Nutcracker Ballet by Tchaikovsky |
Does
the G major scale in our scale book prepare us for this? No, and even a
standard scale fingering is useless here.
But, I hear you say, this is not
really what we mean when we talk about practicing scales. True. The above
example from Tchaikovsky’s ballet is a technical issue of another kind. I offer
it here in order to stretch the imagination, in order to plant the notion that
when we encounter a scale or an arpeggio in a piece of music, we should be
prepared to first notice that it is a scale or arpeggio, or part thereof, and
consider it on its own terms. Does the standard fingering work here? How can we
efficiently negotiate its twists and turns? I promise you the scale in your piece
will not proceed innocently from G to shining G with a prescribed fingering and
no detours. At least, not very often.
No comments:
Post a Comment