![]() |
F. Chopin |
Chopin's études are not studies in the above-referenced sense. They are instead concert pieces designed to showcase skill; they are not a pedagogical canon. It goes without saying, of course, that any technical issue in a piece of music is a learning experience, a study, if you like. So this begs the question, when I play a concert piece called étude, am I supposed think of it as a stepping stone to some other piece that I may or may not play later on? Am I to follow the fingerings imposed by the editor—even those offered by the composer, who has a very different skill set? I'm glad you asked. The answer is no.
This reminds me of a passage I once read in an essay by the distinguished
![]() |
Sir Donald Francis Tovey |
The sound of Chopin's Étude Op. 10, No. 1, is that of cascading arpeggios. The difficulty, if there is one, is that the cascades cover wide open spaces, encompassing a tenth or more at the outer edges. Standard triad fingerings are not always possible for the average hand, as these fingerings often feel like awkward stretches. The over-all technical approach to this concert piece has to do with an understanding of shaping and grouping. But some judicious re-fingering can make all of the difference.
Here are some of my favorites:
![]() |
Chopin Étude Op. 10, No. 1 MM 33-39 |
Many more similar opportunities for expeditious fingering exist. Look for them. This is not cheating.
Thank you very much! It actually never crossed my mind to rework the fingerings in this particular piece, though I do it all the time in other non-etude pieces... Especially the section you highlighted is a torture at speed.
ReplyDelete